Abstract
AF-CBA uses case-based argumentation to justify classifier predictions by arguing about differences between cases. We extend the mechanism by modelling which differences can compensate for each other by constructing arguments using domain knowledge. This involves a secondary argumentation framework. To assist experts in defining the appropriate domain knowledge, we use a rule-based classifier for semi-automated knowledge induction. We use the resulting rule set to derive arguments and demonstrate this with an evaluation procedure.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law |
Editors | Juliano Maranhao |
Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery |
Pages | 102-111 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 979-8-4007-1939-4 |
Publication status | Published - 2025 |