It’s a man’s world; right? How women’s opinions about gender inequality affect physiological responses in men

Ilona Domen, Daan Scheepers, Belle Derks, Ruth van Veelen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In two experiments, we examined how men respond to women who either challenge or legitimize societal gender inequality, and how gender identification moderates these responses. We hypothesized that men feel less threatened by women who legitimize (vs. challenge) the gender hierarchy, and evaluate these women more positively. To investigate these expectations, we assessed self-reports (Studies 1 and 2) and cardiovascular threat/challenge responses (Study 2). Both studies showed that men experience less negative emotions when presented with a woman who legitimized (vs. challenged) the gender hierarchy. Moreover, among men with a relatively high gender identification, a woman who challenged the gender hierarchy elicited a physiological response pattern indicative of threat, whereas a woman who legitimized the gender hierarchy elicited a pattern indicative of challenge. Results are discussed in terms of social identity theory, status threat, and self-distancing behavior.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)703-726
Number of pages24
JournalGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

Keywords

  • gender identification
  • gender inequality
  • psychophysiology
  • social change
  • threat versus challenge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'It’s a man’s world; right? How women’s opinions about gender inequality affect physiological responses in men'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this