It only takes two to tango: against grounding morality in interaction

S. de Maagt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Most Kantian constructivists try to ground universal duties of interpersonal morality in certain interactions between individuals, such as communication, argumentation, shared action or the second-person standpoint. The goal of this paper is to present these, which I refer to as arguments from the second-person perspective, with a dilemma: either the specific kind of interaction that is taken as a starting point of these arguments is inescapable, but in that case the argument does not justify a universal principle of interpersonal morality. Or interaction does have a principle of interpersonal morality among its necessary conditions of possibility, but such forms of interactions are merely optional. I argue that proponents of arguments from the second-person perspective have failed to provide a convincing response to this dilemma and that this failure is systematic. This suggests that the success of Kantian constructivism depends on the success of arguments from the first person.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2767–2783
Number of pages17
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume176
Early online date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Kantian constructivism
  • Transcendental arguments
  • Morality
  • First person
  • Second person

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'It only takes two to tango: against grounding morality in interaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this