TY - JOUR
T1 - It is the flash which appears, the movement will follow
T2 - Investigating the relation between spatial attention and obstacle avoidance
AU - Menger, Rudmer
AU - Dijkerman, H. Chris
AU - Van der Stigchel, Stefan
PY - 2015/5/16
Y1 - 2015/5/16
N2 - Obstacles are represented in the attentional landscape. However, it is currently unclear what the exclusive contribution of attention is to the avoidance response. This is because in earlier obstacle avoidance designs, it was impossible to disentangle an effect of attention from the changing features of the obstacle (e.g., its identity, size, or orientation). Conversely, any feature manipulation could be interpreted as an attentional as well as an obstacle effect on avoidance behavior. We tested the possible tuning of avoidance responses by a spatial cue in two experiments. In both experiments, spatial and nonspatial cues were separately given as go cues for an obstacle avoidance task. Participants had to reach past two obstacles in Experiment 1, and past a single obstacle in Experiment 2. We found that when the right obstacle was flashed, participants veered away more and produced more-variable trajectories over trials than in conditions with nonspatial and left spatial cues, regardless of the presence or absence of another obstacle. Therefore, we concluded that the tuning of avoidance responses can be influenced by spatial cues. Moreover, we speculated that a flashed obstacle receives more attentional weighting in the attentional landscape and prompts a stronger repulsion away from the obstacle.
AB - Obstacles are represented in the attentional landscape. However, it is currently unclear what the exclusive contribution of attention is to the avoidance response. This is because in earlier obstacle avoidance designs, it was impossible to disentangle an effect of attention from the changing features of the obstacle (e.g., its identity, size, or orientation). Conversely, any feature manipulation could be interpreted as an attentional as well as an obstacle effect on avoidance behavior. We tested the possible tuning of avoidance responses by a spatial cue in two experiments. In both experiments, spatial and nonspatial cues were separately given as go cues for an obstacle avoidance task. Participants had to reach past two obstacles in Experiment 1, and past a single obstacle in Experiment 2. We found that when the right obstacle was flashed, participants veered away more and produced more-variable trajectories over trials than in conditions with nonspatial and left spatial cues, regardless of the presence or absence of another obstacle. Therefore, we concluded that the tuning of avoidance responses can be influenced by spatial cues. Moreover, we speculated that a flashed obstacle receives more attentional weighting in the attentional landscape and prompts a stronger repulsion away from the obstacle.
KW - Human
KW - Obstacle avoidance
KW - Planning
KW - Reaching
KW - Visuomotor control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942367555&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13423-015-0821-8
DO - 10.3758/s13423-015-0821-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84942367555
SN - 1069-9384
VL - 22
SP - 1292
EP - 1298
JO - Psychonomic bulletin & review
JF - Psychonomic bulletin & review
IS - 5
ER -