Is framing of treatment options misleading? Maybe, but not because of a lower-bound reading

Pepijn Al*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

Abstract

In a recent paper, Yeo argues that the framing of treatment options by physicians in the contexts of patient’s decision-making conflicts with a physician’s duty of disclosure. I argue that this conclusion is drawn too quickly, as it is questionable whether the empirical research on which Yeo relies is applicable to the framing of treatment options. This means that Yeo’s main assumption is undermined, and we should hold off on concluding that the framing of treatment options is misleading.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is framing of treatment options misleading? Maybe, but not because of a lower-bound reading'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this