Abstract
NO: Climate change needs a relational, embodied and unbounded perspective
In this essay I highlight the difficulties of applying the liberal individual human rights ethos to the global issue of climate change. Climate change is the quintessential transnational collective action problem that cannot be linked to one duty bearer (a state) and one victim (a right holder). I draw on theories from environmental humanities that attempt to bridge the ontological divide between natural and social sciences. I argue for a new way of thinking about co-responsible agents and beneficiaries of a stable climate. This is one that departs from the sovereignty, causality and ex post temporality intrinsic to human rights law. Instead it accounts for relational, embodied and unbounded duties and interests in combatting climate change.
In this essay I highlight the difficulties of applying the liberal individual human rights ethos to the global issue of climate change. Climate change is the quintessential transnational collective action problem that cannot be linked to one duty bearer (a state) and one victim (a right holder). I draw on theories from environmental humanities that attempt to bridge the ontological divide between natural and social sciences. I argue for a new way of thinking about co-responsible agents and beneficiaries of a stable climate. This is one that departs from the sovereignty, causality and ex post temporality intrinsic to human rights law. Instead it accounts for relational, embodied and unbounded duties and interests in combatting climate change.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Contemporary Climate Change Debates |
| Subtitle of host publication | A Student Primer |
| Editors | Mike Hulme |
| Place of Publication | London |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Chapter | 11 |
| Pages | 165-170 |
| Edition | 1 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-0-429-44625-2 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-138-33299-7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 Dec 2019 |
