In vitro-produced horse embryos exhibit a very narrow window of acceptable recipient mare uterine synchrony compared with in vivo-derived embryos

Juan Cuervo-Arango, Anthony N Claes, Tom A E Stout

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    In recent years, the number of equine invitro-produced embryos (IVP) has increased markedly; as yet, there are few reports on what constitutes an 'ideal' recipient for an IVP embryo. This study retrospectively investigated the effects of recipient mare oestrous cycle characteristics on the likelihood of pregnancy after transfer of IVP (n=264) and invivo-derived embryos (n=262). IVP embryos tolerated only a narrow window of recipient mare 'synchrony', with transfer on Day 4 after ovulation resulting in a higher likelihood of ongoing pregnancy (69%) than transfer on Days 3, 5 or 6 (53.2%, 41.3% and 23.1% respectively; P=0.02). In contrast, Day 8 invivo-derived embryos tolerated a wide range of uterine (a)synchrony, with no difference in pregnancy or pregnancy loss for recipients that ovulated between Day 4 and Day 9 before transfer. However, transferring invivo-derived embryos to recipients that had a longer oestrus preceding transfer resulted in higher Day 12 and ongoing pregnancy rate (P<0.01). This effect was not significant in IVP embryos. In conclusion, Day 6-8 IVP blastocysts survive best after transfer to Day 4 recipient mares; Day 8 invivo-derived embryos survive equally well in Day 4-9 recipients, but do better in mares that have a long preceding oestrus.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1904-1911
    JournalReproduction, Fertility and Development
    Volume31
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 7 Oct 2019

    Keywords

    • mare
    • recipient synchrony
    • ICSI
    • embryo

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'In vitro-produced horse embryos exhibit a very narrow window of acceptable recipient mare uterine synchrony compared with in vivo-derived embryos'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this