Introduction: Sovereignty and Social Contestation— Between Violence and Alternative Sociocultural Orders

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In the past decade, the concept of sovereignty has swiftly risen in popularity within anthropological circles, especially in relation to violence in postcolonial and post-authoritarian societies (Das and Poole 2004). The rationale of this section is rooted in the aspiration to build on and further develop anthropological understandings of conflict and violence centered on the notion of sovereignty. Whereas the contributors to the section are indebted to theoretical approaches influenced by the writings of Agamben (1998, 2005), they also present analytic advantages and shortcomings. For instance, a recent critique of Agamben’s notion of sovereignty—and of many of his followers—is that it reproduces totalitarian notions of modern politics that cannot account for the historical existence of “ordered” communities “free from subjection, and … free from subjecting others” (Jennings 2011: 43).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125–128
JournalConflict and Society: Advances in Research
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Introduction: Sovereignty and Social Contestation— Between Violence and Alternative Sociocultural Orders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this