Abstract
Criminological literature has often pointed to the absence or weakness of existing international regulation as important explanatory factors of corporate crime in global markets. This paper addresses the presence of multiple parallel, nested and overlapping regulatory regimes, and explores how such international regime complexity creates pathways to corporate crime. We use the Volkswagen diesel fraud case as a plausibility probe to illustrate such pathways to corporate crime. Our tentative analysis suggests that Volkswagen’s fraud in the US cannot be seen as independent of the EU regulatory regime, which was more lenient and offered various opportunities for creative compliance. We conclude that a regime complexity perspective is a promising addition to existing explanations of corporate crime in international settings and suggest a research agenda for future in-depth analyses of the implications of parallel and conflicting regulatory regimes for corporate crime.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 185–206 |
| Journal | Crime, Law and Social Change |
| Volume | 77 |
| Early online date | 8 Sept 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Caelesta Braun acknowledges financial support by the Dutch Research Council (Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO)), grant no. 452–14-012.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
Keywords
- Corporate crime
- Environmental crime
- Global governance
- International regime complexes
- Software fraud
- State-corporate crime