TY - JOUR
T1 - International bioenergy trade - a review of past developments in the liquid biofuels market
AU - Lamers, P.
AU - Hamelinck, C.N.
AU - Junginger, H.M.
AU - Faaij, A.P.C.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Policies aimed to promote biofuels locally had tremendous effects on global market developments across
the past decade. This article develops insights into the interaction of these policies and market forces
via a comprehensive collection and analysis of international production and trade data. It shows that
world biofuel production and trade has grown exponentially: from below 30 PJ in 2000 to 572 PJ in 2009
for biodiesel; from 340 PJ in 2000 to over 1540 PJ in 2009 for fuel ethanol. The EU has dominated world
biodiesel, whereas the US and Brazil have led fuel ethanol production. World net biofuel trade reached
120–130 PJ in 2009 and was directed towards the most lucrative markets. For biodiesel, this has been
the EU whose imports rose to 92 PJ in 2008 and remained at 70 PJ in 2009. Regarding fuel ethanol, both
the US and the EU have been prime destinations for competitively priced exports, the vast majority of
which originated in Brazil. International biofuel trade is both supply and demand driven. The demand
side was shaped by support policies which generally increased the domestic market value of biofuels.
Trade developed wherever these policies/prices were not accompanied by respective measures. It is
found that import duties largely influenced trade volumes, whereas trade routes were mainly driven by
tariff preferences. Trade regimes appear to have been designed and adapted unilaterally along national
interests causing market disruptions, trade inefficiencies and disputes. To avoid these, it is important to
explicitly consider international trade implications of national trade policies. A prerequisite is to improve
the understanding of the underlying, complex and interwoven links within the market. The current lack
of adequate, homogeneous, international reporting of biofuel production and trade statistics could be
bridged via internationally standardized custom clarifications. Trade factor interrelations also need to be
investigated further.
AB - Policies aimed to promote biofuels locally had tremendous effects on global market developments across
the past decade. This article develops insights into the interaction of these policies and market forces
via a comprehensive collection and analysis of international production and trade data. It shows that
world biofuel production and trade has grown exponentially: from below 30 PJ in 2000 to 572 PJ in 2009
for biodiesel; from 340 PJ in 2000 to over 1540 PJ in 2009 for fuel ethanol. The EU has dominated world
biodiesel, whereas the US and Brazil have led fuel ethanol production. World net biofuel trade reached
120–130 PJ in 2009 and was directed towards the most lucrative markets. For biodiesel, this has been
the EU whose imports rose to 92 PJ in 2008 and remained at 70 PJ in 2009. Regarding fuel ethanol, both
the US and the EU have been prime destinations for competitively priced exports, the vast majority of
which originated in Brazil. International biofuel trade is both supply and demand driven. The demand
side was shaped by support policies which generally increased the domestic market value of biofuels.
Trade developed wherever these policies/prices were not accompanied by respective measures. It is
found that import duties largely influenced trade volumes, whereas trade routes were mainly driven by
tariff preferences. Trade regimes appear to have been designed and adapted unilaterally along national
interests causing market disruptions, trade inefficiencies and disputes. To avoid these, it is important to
explicitly consider international trade implications of national trade policies. A prerequisite is to improve
the understanding of the underlying, complex and interwoven links within the market. The current lack
of adequate, homogeneous, international reporting of biofuel production and trade statistics could be
bridged via internationally standardized custom clarifications. Trade factor interrelations also need to be
investigated further.
U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.022
DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.022
M3 - Article
SN - 1364-0321
VL - 15
SP - 2655
EP - 2676
JO - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
JF - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
IS - 6
ER -