Abstract
Production of oil and gas from sandstone reservoirs leads to small elastic and inelastic strains in the reservoir, which may induce surface subsidence and seismicity. While the elastic component is easily described, the inelastic component, and any rate-sensitivity thereof remain poorly understood in the relevant small strain range (≤1.0%). To address this, we performed a sequence of five stress/strain-cycling plus strain-marker-imaging experiments on a single split-cylinder sample (porosity 20.4%) of Slochteren sandstone from the seismogenic Groningen gas field. The tests were performed under in situ conditions of effective confining pressure (40 MPa) and temperature (100 °C), exploring increasingly large differential stresses (up to 75 MPa) and/or axial strains (up to 4.8%) in consecutive runs. At the small strains relevant to producing reservoirs (≤1.0%), inelastic deformation was largely accommodated by deformation of clay-filled grain contacts. High axial strains (>1.4%) led to pervasive intragranular cracking plus intergranular slip within localized, conjugate bands. Using a simplified sandstone model, we show that the magnitude of inelastic deformation produced in our experiments at small strains (≤1.0%) and stresses relevant to the Groningen reservoir can indeed be roughly accounted for by clay film deformation. Thus, inelastic compaction of the Groningen reservoir is expected to be largely governed by clay film deformation. Compaction by this mechanism is shown to be rate insensitive on production timescales and is anticipated to halt when gas production stops. However, creep by other processes cannot be eliminated. Similar, clay-bearing sandstone reservoirs occur widespread globally, implying a wide relevance of our results.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 12679-12702 |
| Journal | Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth |
| Volume | 124 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2019 |
Funding
This research was carried out in the context of the research program funded by the Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij (NAM). This program aims to fundamentally improve the physical understanding of production‐induced reservoir compaction and seismicity in the seismogenic Groningen gas field. We thank the teams at NAM and Shell Global Solutions for providing the samples used in this study, and for numerous insightful and energetic interactions. Colin Peach and Martyn Drury are thanked for their instructive advice regarding the applied experimental and imaging techniques. We thank UU employees Gert Kastelein, Thony van der Gon‐Netscher and Floris van Oort for technical assistance, and Maartje Hamers for acquiring the chemical element maps used in this study. The mechanical and microstructural data used for this paper are available through https://doi.org/10.24416/UU01‐8AVM9K . Yoda data publication platform Utrecht University.
Keywords
- Clay
- Compaction
- Digital Image Correlation
- Induced seismicity
- Inelastic
- Sandstone