Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework

Ron Boschma*, Gianluca Capone

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    The varieties of capitalism literature has drawn little attention to industrial renewal and diversification, while the related diversification literature has neglected the institutional dimension of industrial change. Bringing together both literatures, the paper proposes that institutions have an impact on the direction of the diversification process, in particular on whether countries gain a comparative advantage in new sectors that are close or far from what is already part of their existing industrial structure. We investigate the diversification process in 23 developed countries by means of detailed product trade data in the period 1995-2010. Our results show that relatedness is a stronger driver of diversification into new products in coordinated market economies, while liberal market economies show a higher probability to move in more unrelated industries: their overarching institutional framework gives countries more freedom to make a jump in their industrial evolution. In particular, we found that the role of relatedness as driver of diversification into new sectors is stronger in the presence of institutions that focus more on 'non-market' coordination in the domains of labor relations, corporate governance relations, product market relations, and inter-firm relations.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1902-1914
    Number of pages13
    JournalResearch Policy
    Volume44
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015

    Keywords

    • Diversification
    • Evolutionary economic geography
    • Institutions
    • Relatedness
    • Varieties of capitalism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this