Injured fighters: traumatisation and contention in post-colonial states

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this special issue1 it has become clear that many ex-combatants did not simply reintegrate into society after independence. This article provides an additional perspective to the socio-political frame of contentious politics dominant in the special issue. A key element to explain their difficult ‘reintegration’ and to understand why former fighters challenged the state, is provided by trauma. The traumatisation of fighters, caused by warfare in the name of national goals, was exacerbated when the new state did not recognise their sacrifices. The resulting anger felt by many ex-combatants, was fuel for political contention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-418
Number of pages8
JournalWar and Society
Volume43
Early online date29 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Funding

I want to thank this special issue's editors Peter Keppy and Roel Frakking for the invitation to write this reflection, and for their remarks and support during the writing process. The reviewers provided valuable comments: I want to express my appreciation for their time and help.

Keywords

  • contentious politics
  • former fighters
  • misrecognition
  • moral injury
  • trauma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Injured fighters: traumatisation and contention in post-colonial states'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this