Abstract
Incremental comprehension of head-final constructions can reveal structural attachment preferences for ambiguousphrases. This study investigates how temporarily ambiguous PPs are processed in Dutch verb-final constructions. In Deaannemer heeft op het dakterras bespaard/gewerkt ‘The contractor has on the roof terrace saved/worked’, the PP islocally ambiguous between attachment as argument and as adjunct. This ambiguity is resolved by the sentence-final verb. In aself-paced reading task, we manipulated the argument/adjunct status of the PP, and its position relative to the verb. While wefound no reading-time differences between argument and adjunct PPs, we did find that transitive verbs, for which the PP is anargument, were read more slowly than intransitive verbs, for which the PP is an adjunct. We suggest that Dutch parsers have apreference for adjunct attachment of preverbal PPs, and discuss our findings in terms of incremental parsing models that aim tominimize costly reanalysis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 38-52 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Linguistics in the Netherlands |
Volume | 37 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 27 Oct 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- arguments and adjuncts
- head-final constructions
- parsing
- PP attachment
- self-paced reading