Incremental structure building of preverbal PPs in Dutch

Cas Coopmans, Gert-Jan Schoenmakers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Incremental comprehension of head-final constructions can reveal structural attachment preferences for ambiguousphrases. This study investigates how temporarily ambiguous PPs are processed in Dutch verb-final constructions. In Deaannemer heeft op het dakterras bespaard/gewerkt ‘The contractor has on the roof terrace saved/worked’, the PP islocally ambiguous between attachment as argument and as adjunct. This ambiguity is resolved by the sentence-final verb. In aself-paced reading task, we manipulated the argument/adjunct status of the PP, and its position relative to the verb. While wefound no reading-time differences between argument and adjunct PPs, we did find that transitive verbs, for which the PP is anargument, were read more slowly than intransitive verbs, for which the PP is an adjunct. We suggest that Dutch parsers have apreference for adjunct attachment of preverbal PPs, and discuss our findings in terms of incremental parsing models that aim tominimize costly reanalysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-52
Number of pages14
JournalLinguistics in the Netherlands
Volume37
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Oct 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • arguments and adjuncts
  • head-final constructions
  • parsing
  • PP attachment
  • self-paced reading

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incremental structure building of preverbal PPs in Dutch'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this