Abstract
Our main result (Theorem A) shows the incompleteness of any consistent sequential theory T formulated in a finite language such that T is axiomatized by a collection of sentences of bounded quantifier-alternation-depth. Our proof employs an appropriate reduction mechanism to rule out the possibility of completeness by simply invoking Tarski's Undefinability of Truth theorem. We also use the proof strategy of Theorem A to obtain other incompleteness results (as in Theorems A+; B and B+).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publisher | arXiv |
Number of pages | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 23 Nov 2023 |
Bibliographical note
6 pages; in this version reference to MathOverflow work of Emil Je\v{r}\'{a}bek has been added, and the author list of [AGLRZ] is now up-to-dateKeywords
- math.LO
- 03F40