Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Incomplete lineage sorting rather than hybridization explains the inconsistent phylogeny of the wisent

    • 2Key Laboratory for Bio-resource and Eco-environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065 China.
    • 3Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Yalelaan 104, 3584 CM The Netherlands.
    • 4Department of Statistics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA.
    • 1State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystem, Institute of Innovation Ecology & College of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000 China.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    The wisent or European bison is the largest European herbivore and is completely cross-fertile with its American relative. However, mtDNA genome of wisent is similar to that of cattle, which suggests that wisent emerged as a hybrid of bison and an extinct cattle-like species. Here, we analyzed nuclear whole-genome sequences of the bovine species, and found only a minor and recent gene flow between wisent and cattle. Furthermore, we identified an appreciable heterogeneity of the nuclear gene tree topologies of the bovine species. The relative frequencies of various topologies, including the mtDNA topology, were consistent with frequencies of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) as estimated by tree coalescence analysis. This indicates that ILS has occurred and may well account for the anomalous wisent mtDNA phylogeny as the outcome of a rare event. We propose that ILS is a possible explanation of phylogenomic anomalies among closely related species.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number169
    JournalCommunications Biology
    Volume1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Incomplete lineage sorting rather than hybridization explains the inconsistent phylogeny of the wisent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this