Inaction and public policy: understanding why policymakers ‘do nothing’

Allan McConnell, P. t Hart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In recent decades, the policy sciences have struggled to come to terms with the significance of inaction in public policy. Inaction refers to instances when policymakers ‘do nothing’ about societal issues. This article aims to put the study of inaction on a new footing. It presents a five-part typology of forms of inaction before focusing on detail on core drivers of inaction found at four policy-making loci: individuals (coping behaviour), public organisations (information pathologies), governments (agenda control and protection) and networks (non-coordination and lack of feasibility). Acknowledging the conceptual and methodological challenges of researching inaction, it concludes by identifying strategies for putting ‘doing nothing’ (back) on the research agenda of the policy sciences.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)645-661
Number of pages17
JournalPolicy Sciences
Volume52
Issue number4
Early online date9 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Keywords

  • Policy inaction
  • Non-decisions
  • Agenda denial
  • Blind spots
  • Policy sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inaction and public policy: understanding why policymakers ‘do nothing’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this