Abstract
In Bank Refah Kargaran (case C-134/19 P Bank Refah Kargaran v Council
ECLI:EU:C:2020:793), the Court of Justice decided that it has jurisdiction to award damages for noncontractual liability incurred by the EU for harm caused by certain restrictive measures in Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) decisions. In so doing, the Court of Justice further extends its jurisdiction within the CFSP. The Court interprets narrowly the limits to its jurisdiction provided for in arts 24 TEU and 275 TFEU. This Insight finds the Court’s reasoning insufficient to justify a departure from the Treaty text, which limits the jurisdiction the Court of Justice of the EU to “proceedings […] reviewing the legality of decisions providing for restrictive measures”. The action for damages is no such proceeding.
ECLI:EU:C:2020:793), the Court of Justice decided that it has jurisdiction to award damages for noncontractual liability incurred by the EU for harm caused by certain restrictive measures in Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) decisions. In so doing, the Court of Justice further extends its jurisdiction within the CFSP. The Court interprets narrowly the limits to its jurisdiction provided for in arts 24 TEU and 275 TFEU. This Insight finds the Court’s reasoning insufficient to justify a departure from the Treaty text, which limits the jurisdiction the Court of Justice of the EU to “proceedings […] reviewing the legality of decisions providing for restrictive measures”. The action for damages is no such proceeding.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 17-24 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | European Papers |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Mar 2021 |
Keywords
- Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)
- jurisdiction
- action for damages
- restrictive measures
- unity of the EU legal order
- – right to an effective remedy