In the eye of the beholder: Perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during acquaintanceship processes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The authors examined associations of perceived similarity, actual similarity, and peer-rated similarity in personality with friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process in a naturalistic setting. Self- and peer-rated personality data were gathered from undergraduates (mean age = 18.9) at 5 time points during the first year of university using a round-robin design. Whereas perceived similarity and peer-rated similarity in personality were concurrently associated with more friendship intensity for just-acquainted individuals, actual similarity in personality was not. Further, bidirectional cross-lagged associations between perceived similarity and friendship intensity were found. Peer-rated similarity was also associated with increases in friendship intensity, and this association was mediated by communication frequency. These results indicate that specific types of similarity in personality are differentially associated with friendship intensity during early phases of acquaintanceship in a real-life setting. Further, insight was provided in the direction of causality between similarity and attraction: Perceived and peer-rated similarity seem to breed friendship intensity, whereas friendship intensity seems to breed perceived similarity only. Finally, peers' expectations seem to affect individuals' communicative behaviors, which in turn affect friendship formation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1152-1165
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume96
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • similarity-attraction
  • personality
  • friendship intensity
  • cross-lagged multilevel modeling
  • communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In the eye of the beholder: Perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during acquaintanceship processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this