Improving Schroeppel and Shamir's algorithm for subset sum via orthogonal vectors.

Jesper Nederlof, Karol Wegrzycki

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We present an O∗(20.5n) time and O∗(20.249999n) space randomized algorithm for solving worst-case Subset Sum instances with n integers. This is the first improvement over the long-standing O∗(2n/2) time and O∗(2n/4) space algorithm due to Schroeppel and Shamir (FOCS 1979).

We breach this gap in two steps: (1) We present a space efficient reduction to the Orthogonal Vectors Problem (OV), one of the most central problem in Fine-Grained Complexity. The reduction is established via an intricate combination of the method of Schroeppel and Shamir, and the representation technique introduced by Howgrave-Graham and Joux (EUROCRYPT 2010) for designing Subset Sum algorithms for the average case regime. (2) We provide an algorithm for OV that detects an orthogonal pair among N given vectors in {0,1}d with support size d/4 in time Õ(N· 2d/d d/4). Our algorithm for OV is based on and refines the representative families framework developed by Fomin, Lokshtanov, Panolan and Saurabh (J. ACM 2016).

Our reduction uncovers a curious tight relation between Subset Sum and OV, because any improvement of our algorithm for OV would imply an improvement over the runtime of Schroeppel and Shamir, which is also a long standing open problem.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSTOC 2021: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing
Place of PublicationNew York, United States
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages1670-1683
ISBN (Print)978-1-4503-8053-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • Knapsack
  • Subset Sum
  • Meet-in-the-Middle
  • Space Complexity
  • Representation Technique

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving Schroeppel and Shamir's algorithm for subset sum via orthogonal vectors.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this