Abstract
Low repeatability of migration time, peak area, and linearity (pI vs. mobilization time) is a problem often encountered in capillary IEF (cIEF) and is mainly caused by protein precipitation and protein-wall interactions. In order to study the influence of these phenomena, the effect of different classes of additives on repeatability of migration time, peak area and linearity of a mixture of seven model proteins has been investigated. Moreover, the influence of these additives on protein signal suppression in MALDI-TOF MS has been studied. The optimal ampholyte blend (stabilizes pH gradient) to be used depends on the selected UV detection wavelength. All tested ampholyte blends show a significant and comparable signal suppression in MS. The best detergent (to prevent precipitation and wall interaction) should be determined for each sample individually, but generally polyethylene oxide and zwitterionic detergents show good repeatability for migration time (RSD <4.5%) and peak area (majority <10%). The RSD of R 2 is <1.3% for the hydrophilic protein mixture. However, these components cause severe signal suppression in MS. Therefore glucoside detergents should preferably be used for MS coupling. Viscosity-increasing agents (for hydrodynamic wall coating and to minimize diffusion) in particular cellulose derivatives, give good repeatability for migration times (RSD
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1985-1996 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Electrophoresis |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2008 |
Keywords
- capillary isoelectric focusing
- matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization - time of flight mass spectrometry
- proteins
- CARRIER AMPHOLYTES
- PH GRADIENTS
- PROTEINS
- ELECTROPHORESIS
- SEPARATION
- PROTEOMICS
- RESOLUTION
- PEPTIDES
- POLYDISPERSITY
- BIOMOLECULES