Implication of long-distance regulation of the HOXA cluster in a patient with postaxial polydactyly

Elisabeth M Lodder, Bert H Eussen, Daniëlla A C M van Hassel, A Jeannette M Hoogeboom, Pino J Poddighe, J Henk Coert, Ben A Oostra, Annelies de Klein, Esther de Graaff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Apparently balanced chromosomal inversions may lead to disruption of developmentally important genes at the breakpoints of the inversion, causing congenital malformations. Characterization of such inversions may therefore lead to new insights in human development. Here, we report on a de novo inversion of chromosome 7 (p15.2q36.3) in a patient with postaxial polysyndactyly. The breakpoints do not disrupt likely candidate genes for the limb phenotype observed in the patient. However, on the p-arm the breakpoint separates the HOXA cluster from a gene desert containing several conserved noncoding elements, suggesting that a disruption of a cis-regulatory circuit of the HOXA cluster could be the underlying cause of the phenotype in this patient.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)737-44
Number of pages8
JournalChromosome Research
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Base Sequence
  • Blotting, Southern
  • Chromosome Breakage
  • Chromosome Inversion
  • Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7/genetics
  • Chromosomes, Human, Y/genetics
  • Foot Deformities, Congenital/genetics
  • Gene Expression Profiling
  • Gene Expression Regulation
  • Hand Deformities, Congenital/genetics
  • Homeodomain Proteins/genetics
  • Humans
  • In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
  • Karyotyping
  • Molecular Sequence Data
  • Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
  • Polydactyly/genetics
  • RNA, Messenger/genetics
  • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implication of long-distance regulation of the HOXA cluster in a patient with postaxial polydactyly'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this