Impact of land restitution benefits on Water, Energy and Food (WEF) misgovernance and social injustice

Saul Ngarava

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Land restitution has been used to achieve redistributive justice. However, such social justice has been compromised by the misgovernance of water, energy, and food (WEF) which has resulted in distributive injustices and compromised welfare outcomes. The objective of the study was to ascertain the land restitution benefactor impacts on WEF misgovernance in lieu of offsetting social injustice. The study was carried out in Matatiele, Magareng and Greater Taung Local Municipalities in South Africa. A purposively selected sample of 1184 households was obtained through a cross-sectional survey using a semi-structured questionnaire. Vulnerability indices, independent sample t-tests and Propensity Score Matching were used to analyze the data. The results showed that land restitution beneficiaries were vulnerable to WEF misgovernance relative to social injustice. In addition, becoming a land restitution benefactor had a significant impact and increased the level of vulnerability to WEF misgovernance. This was mainly through increased exposure and sensitivity to WEF misgovernance. Benefiting from land restitution did not have an impact on vulnerability to WEF social injustice, even though exposure and adaptive capacity to social injustice were increased. The study concludes that benefiting from land restitution increased vulnerability to WEF misgovernance while having no impact on social injustice. The study recommends improving access and fixing dilapidated WEF infrastructure in land-restituted areas. Furthermore, there is a need to implement livelihood-improving programs in addition to social protection support to enhance access to WEF resources. Water, energy, and food (WEF) decision-making should be decentralized to improve participation, governance, and procedural justice.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100386
JournalEnvironmental and Sustainability Indicators
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author

Funding

Land restitution has been used to achieve redistributive justice. However, such social justice has been compromised by the misgovernance of water, energy, and food (WEF) which has resulted in distributive injustices and compromised welfare outcomes. The objective of the study was to ascertain the land restitution benefactor impacts on WEF misgovernance in lieu of offsetting social injustice. The study was carried out in Matatiele, Magareng and Greater Taung Local Municipalities in South Africa. A purposively selected sample of 1184 households was obtained through a cross-sectional survey using a semi-structured questionnaire. Vulnerability indices, independent sample t-tests and Propensity Score Matching were used to analyze the data. The results showed that land restitution beneficiaries were vulnerable to WEF misgovernance relative to social injustice. In addition, becoming a land restitution benefactor had a significant impact and increased the level of vulnerability to WEF misgovernance. This was mainly through increased exposure and sensitivity to WEF misgovernance. Benefiting from land restitution did not have an impact on vulnerability to WEF social injustice, even though exposure and adaptive capacity to social injustice were increased. The study concludes that benefiting from land restitution increased vulnerability to WEF misgovernance while having no impact on social injustice. The study recommends improving access and fixing dilapidated WEF infrastructure in land-restituted areas. Furthermore, there is a need to implement livelihood-improving programs in addition to social protection support to enhance access to WEF resources. Water, energy, and food (WEF) decision-making should be decentralized to improve participation, governance, and procedural justice.This work is based on the research supported wholly by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa and the Dutch Research Council (de Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek - NWO) Project UID 129352. The NRF and NWO are thanked for their financial contribution. Any opinion, finding, conclusion or recommendation expressed in this material is that of the author(s) and the NRF and NWO do not accept any liability in this regard. Further acknowledgement is targeted towards Environmental Rural Solution (ERS), Vaalharts Water User Association and World Wildlife Fund (WWF)-South Africa in assistance with the data collection process. This work is based on the research supported wholly by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa and the Dutch Research Council (de Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek - NWO) Project UID 129352 . The NRF and NWO are thanked for their financial contribution. Any opinion, finding, conclusion or recommendation expressed in this material is that of the author(s) and the NRF and NWO do not accept any liability in this regard. Further acknowledgement is targeted towards Environmental Rural Solution (ERS), Vaalharts Water User Association and World Wildlife Fund (WWF)-South Africa in assistance with the data collection process.

FundersFunder number
World Wildlife Fund
Water Environment Federation
Vaalharts Water User Association and World Wildlife Fund
National Research Foundation
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekUID 129352

    Keywords

    • Energy and Food (WEF)
    • Land restitution
    • Misgovernance
    • Propensity score matching
    • Social injustice
    • Vulnerability
    • Water

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of land restitution benefits on Water, Energy and Food (WEF) misgovernance and social injustice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this