Imagining solidarity in the twenty-first century: towards a performative postsecularism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Imagining solidarity in the twenty-first century is particularly difficult in light of three factors: religious diversity, a religious/secular binary and uncertainty as to the political future. This article employs myth as a lens for exploring and developing responses to these difficulties coalescing around the term postsecular. It suggests that these difficulties are reproduced rather than overcome in Jürgen Habermas’ work. It then distinguishes between the postsecular, postsecularity and postsecularism to demonstrate how recent work offers new possibilities. Finally, it draws on original ethnography to develop this work. It claims that myth is central to how both religious and nonreligious people imagine solidarity. It suggests that myth is primarily performed rather than rationally argued, and calls for myths to be judged on the basis of the performances they produce. Finally, it suggests that the content of myths is less important than how and by whom they are constructed. Together, these insights constitute performative postsecularism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-158
JournalReligion, State and Society
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • solidarity
  • myth
  • habermas
  • postsecular
  • performative

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imagining solidarity in the twenty-first century: towards a performative postsecularism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this