Abstract

Concerns have been raised about the possibility of effects from exposure to short wavelength light (SWL), defined here as 380-550 nm, on human health. The spectral sensitivity of the human circadian timing system peaks at around 480 nm, much shorter than the peak sensitivity of daytime vision (i.e., 555 nm). Some experimental studies have demonstrated effects on the circadian timing system and on sleep from SWL exposure, especially when SWL exposure occurs in the evening or at night. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has identified a lack of consensus among public health officials regarding whether SWL from artificial sources disrupts circadian rhythm, and if so, whether SWL-disrupted circadian rhythm is associated with adverse health outcomes. Systematic reviews of studies designed to examine the effects of SWL on sleep and human health have shown conflicting results. There are many variables that can affect the outcome of these experimental studies. One of the main problems in earlier studies was the use of photometric quantities as a surrogate for SWL exposure. Additionally, the measurement of ambient light may not be an accurate measure of the amount of light impinging on the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells, which are now known to play a major role in the human circadian timing system. Furthermore, epidemiological studies of long-term effects of chronic SWL exposure per se on human health are lacking. ICNIRP recommends that an analysis of data gaps be performed to delineate the types of studies needed, the parameters that should be addressed, and the methodology that should be applied in future studies so that a decision about the need for exposure guidelines can be made. In the meantime, ICNIRP supports some recommendations for how the quality of future studies might be improved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-248
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Physics
Volume126
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

Funding

Collaborators: Sharon Miller, ICNIRP; Christian Cajochen, ICNIRP SEG and Centre for Chronobiology at the University of Basel, Switzerland; Adele Green, ICNIRP SEG and QIMR BerghoferMedical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; John Hanifin, ICNIRP SEG and Thomas Jefferson University; Anke Huss, ICNIRP and Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS) at Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Ken Karipidis, ICNIRP and Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Authority (ARPANSA); Sarah Loughran, ICNIRP SEG and Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Authority (ARPANSA); Gunnhild Oftedal, ICNIRP and Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU); John O'Hagan, ICNIRP SEG and Public Health England, United Kingdom; David H Sliney, ICNIRP SEG; Rodney Croft, ICNIRP and Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research, Illawarra Health Medical Research Institute, University ofWollongong, Australia; Eric van Rongen, ICNIRP and Health Council, The Netherlands;Nigel Cridland, ICNIRP and Public Health England, United Kingdom; Guglielmo d'Inzeo, ICNIRP and "La Sapienza"University of Rome, Italy; Akimasa Hirata, ICNIRP and Nagoya Institute of Technology, Japan; Carmela Marino, ICNIRP and Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Italy; Martin Roosli, ICNIRP and Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Switzerland; SoichiWatanabe, ICNIRP and National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Japan. ICNIRP received annual support to carry out this and other works from the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV), the European Union (SOCPL), the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA), the New Zealand Ministry of Health, and the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA). ICNIRP receives funds from public and non-commercial bodies only. Information concerning the support received by ICNIRP throughout the years is available at http://www.icnirp.org/en/abouticnirp/ support-icnirp/index.html. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author( s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the organizations they are professionally affiliated with nor those of the donors or the granting authorities which cant be held responsible for them.

Funders
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Authority
Carmela Marino
German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation
Gunnhild Oftedal
Health Council
ICNIRP
ICNIRP SEG
Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences
International Radiation Protection Association
John Hanifin
Ken Karipidis
Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection
Rodney Croft
SOCPL
University ofWollongong
Public Health Institute
Universität Basel
Thomas Jefferson University
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
European Neuroendocrine Association
Nagoya Institute of Technology
European Commission
Ministry of Health, New Zealand
Universiteit Utrecht
Public Health England
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology
Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz
Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie, l'energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile

    Keywords

    • International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)
    • health effects
    • non-ionizing
    • radiation
    • safety standards

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'ICNIRP Statement on Short Wavelength Light Exposure from Indoor Artificial Sources and Human Health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this