"I think you are doing a bad job!": The Effect of Blame Attribution by a Robot in Human-Robot Collaboration

Diede van der Hoorn, Anouk Neerincx, Maartje de Graaf

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Robots will increasingly collaborate with human partners necessitating research into how robots negotiate negative collaborative outcomes. This study investigates the effect of blame attribution on trust assessments in human-robot collaboration. Participants (n = 60) collaboratively played a game with a humanoid robot in one of four conditions in a 2 (blame correctness: correct vs. incorrect) by 2 (blame target: human vs. robot) between-subjects experiment. Results show that people evaluate a robot more positively when it blames itself for collaborative failures, especially, it seems, in the case of incorrect self-blame. Our findings indicate a need to further research on effective communication strategies for robots that need to negotiate collaborative failures without compromising the trust relationships with its human partner.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHRI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages140-148
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9781450382892
ISBN (Print)9781450382892
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Blame attribution
  • Communication strategies
  • Human-robot collaboration
  • Human-robot interaction
  • Trust

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '"I think you are doing a bad job!": The Effect of Blame Attribution by a Robot in Human-Robot Collaboration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this