Abstract
Robots will increasingly collaborate with human partners necessitating research into how robots negotiate negative collaborative outcomes. This study investigates the effect of blame attribution on trust assessments in human-robot collaboration. Participants (n = 60) collaboratively played a game with a humanoid robot in one of four conditions in a 2 (blame correctness: correct vs. incorrect) by 2 (blame target: human vs. robot) between-subjects experiment. Results show that people evaluate a robot more positively when it blames itself for collaborative failures, especially, it seems, in the case of incorrect self-blame. Our findings indicate a need to further research on effective communication strategies for robots that need to negotiate collaborative failures without compromising the trust relationships with its human partner.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | HRI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction |
Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery |
Pages | 140-148 |
Number of pages | 9 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781450382892 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781450382892 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 8 Mar 2021 |
Keywords
- Blame attribution
- Communication strategies
- Human-robot collaboration
- Human-robot interaction
- Trust