“I Do Not Have an Opinion About That Yet”: Qualitative Research on Perceived Procedural Justice of Self-Represented Litigants in Early Stages of Small Claims Procedures in the Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Building on recent suggestions that there are, thus far, unnoticed levels of increased polarization and decreased perceived legitimacy of the judiciary within the Netherlands, we studied the experiences of self-represented litigants in early stages of Dutch small claims procedures. Our objective was to assess by means of qualitative interviews (a) whether litigants would mention experiences of perceived procedural justice during these court procedures and, (b) if so, what elements of perceived procedural justice they would mention, (c) how they form judgments of trust in judges, and (d) whether interviewees would mention spontaneously that in these early stages of court procedures, with limited information available, they do not know (yet) whether they perceive a judge as fair or can trust a judge handling their case. Research Question: What role, if any, do judgments of procedural justice, trust in judges, and informational uncertainty play in early stages of civil procedures? Method: We held 115 interviews with self-represented litigants about their experiences with prehearings in Dutch small claims procedures. We asked respondents in various ways about procedural justice and trust in judges. We coded whether litigants mentioned spontaneously that they did not have enough information to answer these questions. Results: Respondents mentioned procedural fairness perceptions spontaneously when asked directly about fair treatment and when interviewed about specific procedural justice components. Interestingly, almost half of the respondents indicated that they did not have an opinion about at least one procedural justice component. When asked about trust in judges, various respondents also indicated that they did not have an opinion yet. Conclusions: These results suggest that (a) perceived procedural justice matters to self-represented litigants in civil procedures, and (b) in early stages of court procedures, people may not know whether they perceive a judge as fair or can trust judges and may indicate this spontaneously in interviews.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)222-236
Number of pages15
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume49
Issue number3
Early online date19 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Psychological Association

Keywords

  • informational uncertainty
  • procedural justice
  • small claims procedures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“I Do Not Have an Opinion About That Yet”: Qualitative Research on Perceived Procedural Justice of Self-Represented Litigants in Early Stages of Small Claims Procedures in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this