HRM and social legitimacy in the public sector

Peter Leisink, Peter Boxall

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

There is a dearth of studies of HRM in a public sector context that examine the legitimacy of HRM and its contribution to public service performance. This neglect is striking because public management studies acknowledge that public service performance is a contested concept involving many stakeholders with different views on what good performance is. The chapter describes how the classic bureaucracy and the NPM models of public governance embody different logics of legitimacy that have affected HRM policies differently. The legitimacy of today’s HRM policies and their public service outcomes are examined distinguishing between internal and external stakeholders. The literature review shows a range of significant HRM-related issues, including job insecurity, role overload, and mixed progress in equal-employment opportunities. These affect the internal legitimacy of HRM as perceived by employees but are also endangering the sustainability of various public services, thereby creating severe risks for HRM’s external legitimacy.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch Handbook on HRM in the Public Sector
Subtitle of host publicationElgar Handbooks in Public Administration and Management
EditorsB. Steijn, E. Knies
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Chapter14
Pages189-201
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781789906622
ISBN (Print)9781789906615
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Bram Steijn and Eva Knies 2021.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'HRM and social legitimacy in the public sector'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this