Abstract
In this journal, Dicken & Lipton [2006] argued, following Musgrave [1985], that a
constructive empiricist cannot coherently draw the distinction between
observable objects (events, processes, …) and unobservable ones. We argue to
the contrary: the distinction can be drawn coherently, but add a qualification to
deal with an associated problem concerning the language of science.
Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 197-205 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Analysis |
Volume | 68 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |