Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How to scale-up: a comparative case study of scaling up a district health management strengthening intervention in Ghana, Malawi and Uganda

  • Susan Bulthuis*
  • , Maryse Kok
  • , Olivier Onvlee
  • , Thomasena O’Byrne
  • , Samuel Amon
  • , Justine Namakula
  • , Kingsley Chikaphupha
  • , Jana Gerold
  • , Wesam Mansour
  • , Joanna Raven
  • , Jacqueline E. W. Broerse
  • , Marjolein Dieleman
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Royal Tropical Institute

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The need to scale up public health interventions in low- and middle-income countries to ensure equitable and sustainable impact is widely acknowledged. However, there has been little understanding of how projects have sought to address the importance of scale-up in the design and implementation of their initiatives. This paper aims to gain insight into the facilitators of the scale-up of a district-level health management strengthening intervention in Ghana, Malawi and Uganda.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>The study took a comparative case study approach with two rounds of data collection (2019 and 2021) in which a combination of different qualitative methods was applied. Interviews and group discussions took place with district, regional and national stakeholders who were involved in the implementation and scale-up of the intervention.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>A shared vision among the different stakeholders about how to institutionalize the intervention into the existing system facilitated scale-up. The importance of champions was also identified, as they influence buy-in from key decision makers, and when decision makers are convinced, political and financial support for scale-up can increase. In two countries, a specific window of opportunity facilitated scale-up. Taking a flexible approach towards scale-up, allowing adaptations of the intervention and the scale-up strategy to the context, was also identified as a facilitator. The context of decentralization and the politics and power relations between stakeholders involved also influenced scale-up.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Despite the identification of the facilitators of the scale-up, full integration of the intervention into the health system has proven challenging in all countries. Approaching scale-up from a systems change perspective could be useful in future scale-up efforts, as it focuses on sustainable systems change at scale (e.g. improving district health management) by testing a combination of interventions that could contribute to the envisaged change, rather than horizontally scaling up and trying to embed one particular intervention in the system.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
Original languageEnglish
Article number35
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jan 2023
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to scale-up: a comparative case study of scaling up a district health management strengthening intervention in Ghana, Malawi and Uganda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this