Abstract
The retrospective evaluation of an event tends to be based on how the experience felt
during the most intense moment and the last moment. Two experiments tested
whether this so-called peak-end effect influences how primary school students are
affected by peer assessments. In both experiments, children (ages 7–12) assessed
two classmates on their behaviour in school and then received two manipulated
assessments. In Experiment 1 (N = 30), one assessment consisted of four negative
ratings and the other of four negative ratings with an extra moderately negative
rating added to the end. In Experiment 2 (N = 44), one assessment consisted of four
positive ratings, and the other added an extra moderately positive rating to the
end. Consistent with the peak-end effect, the extended assessment in Experiment 1
and the short assessment in Experiment 2 were remembered as more pleasant and
less difficult to deal with, which shaped children’s peer assessment preferences and
prospective choices of which assessment to repeat. These findings indicate that the
process of peer assessment can be improved by ending the feedback with the
most positive part of the assessment.
during the most intense moment and the last moment. Two experiments tested
whether this so-called peak-end effect influences how primary school students are
affected by peer assessments. In both experiments, children (ages 7–12) assessed
two classmates on their behaviour in school and then received two manipulated
assessments. In Experiment 1 (N = 30), one assessment consisted of four negative
ratings and the other of four negative ratings with an extra moderately negative
rating added to the end. In Experiment 2 (N = 44), one assessment consisted of four
positive ratings, and the other added an extra moderately positive rating to the
end. Consistent with the peak-end effect, the extended assessment in Experiment 1
and the short assessment in Experiment 2 were remembered as more pleasant and
less difficult to deal with, which shaped children’s peer assessment preferences and
prospective choices of which assessment to repeat. These findings indicate that the
process of peer assessment can be improved by ending the feedback with the
most positive part of the assessment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 114-1121 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Cognition and Emotion |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- Peak-end rule
- peer assessment
- memory
- remembered utility
- hedonic evaluation