How many reviewers are required to obtain reliable evaluations of NIH R01 grant proposals?

Patrick S. Forscher
, Markus Brauer
, Flavio Azevedo
, William Taylor Laimaka Cox
, Patricia G. Devine

extern

Research output: Working paper › Preprint › Academic

Original language	English
Publisher	PsyArXiv
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/483zj
Publication status	Published - 9 Apr 2019
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.31234/osf.io/483zjLicence: CC BY

Other files and links

https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/483zj

Cite this

@techreport{d524119efd5b46eb986bcc5c62fd160e,

title = "How many reviewers are required to obtain reliable evaluations of NIH R01 grant proposals?",

author = "Forscher, \{Patrick S.\} and Markus Brauer and Flavio Azevedo and Cox, \{William Taylor Laimaka\} and Devine, \{Patricia G.\}",

year = "2019",

month = apr,

day = "9",

doi = "10.31234/osf.io/483zj",

language = "English",

publisher = "PsyArXiv",

type = "WorkingPaper",

institution = "PsyArXiv",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - How many reviewers are required to obtain reliable evaluations of NIH R01 grant proposals?

AU - Forscher, Patrick S.

AU - Brauer, Markus

AU - Azevedo, Flavio

AU - Cox, William Taylor Laimaka

AU - Devine, Patricia G.

PY - 2019/4/9

Y1 - 2019/4/9

UR - https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/483zj

U2 - 10.31234/osf.io/483zj

DO - 10.31234/osf.io/483zj

M3 - Preprint

BT - How many reviewers are required to obtain reliable evaluations of NIH R01 grant proposals?

PB - PsyArXiv

ER -