Abstract
Determining the number of factors is a decisive, yet very difficult decision a researcher faces when conducting an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Over the last decades, numerous so-called factor retention criteria have been developed to infer the latent dimensionality fromempirical data.While some tutorials and reviewarticles on EFA exist which give recommendations on how to determine the number of latent factors, there is no comprehensive overview that categorizes the existing approaches and integrates the results of existing simulation studies evaluating the various methods in different data conditions. With this article, we want to provide such an overviewenabling (applied) researchers to make an informed decision when choosing a factor retention criterion. Summarizing the most important results from recent simulation studies, we provide guidance when to rely on which method and call for a more thoughtful handling of overly simple heuristics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Psychological Methods |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 13 Feb 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 American Psychological Association
Keywords
- dimensionality assessment
- exploratory factor analysis
- factor retention
- measurement models
- number of factors