TY - JOUR
T1 - How International Organisations Shape International Environmental Law through Non-Binding Instruments
T2 - An Account of the Exercise of International Public Authority
AU - Teixeira, Rita Guerreiro
PY - 2023/2/14
Y1 - 2023/2/14
N2 - This article lays out a framework of authority for the analysis of non binding instruments of international organisations as exercises of international public authority. This framework considers influence on freedom of addressees and law-appliers, rather than formal bindingness, to be the decisive criteria of authority. I argue that this approach can better explain the legal relevance and impact of these instruments on the conduct of different actors, particularly in the field of international environmental law. The article further proposes that the decision-making processes taking place inside international organisations, which are a distinctive feature of this form of governance, influence the authority of the instruments adopted. These processes have, at least, three characteristics that are particularly relevant in relation to environmental regulation: (i) the scientific and technical expertise of the organisation and other participants, (ii) the range of participants and the achievement of broad consensus within relevant communities of practice, and (iii) the development of procedural norms necessary to implement and comply with existing obligations. Finally, this framework of authority is applied to analyse the authority of the instruments adopted by the Food and Agriculture Organisation on the regulation of sustainable fisheries. This case study illustrates the explanatory value of the framework and draws conclusions on its implications for the law of international organisations.
AB - This article lays out a framework of authority for the analysis of non binding instruments of international organisations as exercises of international public authority. This framework considers influence on freedom of addressees and law-appliers, rather than formal bindingness, to be the decisive criteria of authority. I argue that this approach can better explain the legal relevance and impact of these instruments on the conduct of different actors, particularly in the field of international environmental law. The article further proposes that the decision-making processes taking place inside international organisations, which are a distinctive feature of this form of governance, influence the authority of the instruments adopted. These processes have, at least, three characteristics that are particularly relevant in relation to environmental regulation: (i) the scientific and technical expertise of the organisation and other participants, (ii) the range of participants and the achievement of broad consensus within relevant communities of practice, and (iii) the development of procedural norms necessary to implement and comply with existing obligations. Finally, this framework of authority is applied to analyse the authority of the instruments adopted by the Food and Agriculture Organisation on the regulation of sustainable fisheries. This case study illustrates the explanatory value of the framework and draws conclusions on its implications for the law of international organisations.
U2 - 10.2924/EJLS.2023.003
DO - 10.2924/EJLS.2023.003
M3 - Article
SN - 1973-2937
VL - 14
SP - 85
EP - 102
JO - European Journal of Legal Studies
JF - European Journal of Legal Studies
IS - 2
ER -