How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection

  • Bas W. Borsje*
  • , Bregje K. van Wesenbeeck
  • , Frank Dekker
  • , Peter Paalvast
  • , Tjeerd J. Bouma
  • , Marieke M. van Katwijk
  • , Mindert B. de Vries
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Traditionally, protection of the coastal area from flooding is approached from an engineering perspective. This approach has often resulted in negative or unforeseen impacts on local ecology and is even known to impact surrounding ecosystems on larger scales. In this paper, the utilization of ecosystem engineering species for achieving civil-engineering objectives or the facilitation of multiple use of limited space in coastal protection is focused upon, either by using ecosystem engineering species that trap sediment and damp waves (oyster beds, mussel beds, willow floodplains and marram grass), or by adjusting hard substrates to enhance ecological functioning. Translating desired coastal protection functionality into designs that make use of the capability of appropriate ecosystem engineering species is, however, hampered by lack of a generic framework to decide which ecosystem engineering species or what type of hard-substrate adaptations may be used where and when. In this paper we review successful implementation of ecosystem engineering species in coastal protection for a sandy shore and propose a framework to select the appropriate measures based on the spatial and temporal scale of coastal protection, resulting in a dynamic interaction between engineering and ecology. Modeling and monitoring the bio-physical interactions is needed, as it allows to upscale successful implementations and predict otherwise unforeseen impacts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-122
Number of pages10
JournalEcological Engineering
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work is part of the PhD research of the first author, which is co-supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation STW, applied science division of NWO and the Technology Program of the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs. Moreover, The Rijkswaterstaat WaterINNovatiebron (WINN) is acknowledged for financing the Biobouwers van de Kust project and Ecoshape ( www.ecoshape.nl ) is acknowledged for the Building with Nature program. We thank Prof. Dr. Suzanne Hulscher, Prof. Dr. Peter Herman and Prof. Dr. Brian Silliman for their valuable comments on the draft of this manuscript. Finally, we acknowledge the useful comments provided by two anonymous reviewers.

Funding

This work is part of the PhD research of the first author, which is co-supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation STW, applied science division of NWO and the Technology Program of the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs. Moreover, The Rijkswaterstaat WaterINNovatiebron (WINN) is acknowledged for financing the Biobouwers van de Kust project and Ecoshape ( www.ecoshape.nl ) is acknowledged for the Building with Nature program. We thank Prof. Dr. Suzanne Hulscher, Prof. Dr. Peter Herman and Prof. Dr. Brian Silliman for their valuable comments on the draft of this manuscript. Finally, we acknowledge the useful comments provided by two anonymous reviewers.

Keywords

  • Artificial habitats
  • Building with Nature
  • Coastal protection
  • Dutch coastline
  • Ecosystem engineering species
  • Ecosystem-based management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this