How do socially anxious women evaluate mimicry? A virtual reality study

Janna N. Vrijsen*, Wolf-Gero Lange, Ron Dotsch, Daniel H. J. Wigboldus, Mike Rinck

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Being subtly mimicked leads to more positive evaluations of the mimicker. Socially anxious individuals (SAs), however, should respond differently. SAs would probably either not process mimicry due to self-focused attention or not appreciate such social behaviour. Consequently, we hypothesised that they would not think more positively about a mimicking person. To test this prediction, 25 SAs and 25 non-anxious controls (NACs), all female, interacted with two virtual men (avatars) separately. One avatar mimicked the participant's head movements while giving an opinionated speech, whereas the other did not mimic. Afterwards, participants evaluated the speeches and the avatars. As predicted, NACs evaluated the mimicking avatar and his speech more positively than the non-mimicking avatar. SAs, on the other hand, evaluated both avatars and their speeches the same; comparable to how NACs evaluated the non-mimicking avatar. These results conform to the notion that mimicking does not have positive effects on SAs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number910361255
Pages (from-to)840-847
Number of pages8
JournalCognition & Emotion
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Social anxiety
  • Mimicry
  • Evaluation
  • Virtual reality
  • ANXIETY
  • PHOBIA
  • PERCEPTION
  • BEHAVIOR
  • FEAR

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How do socially anxious women evaluate mimicry? A virtual reality study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this