How did women count? A note on gender specific age heaping differences in the 16th-19th century

P. Foldvari, J van Leeuwen-Li

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    The role of human capital in economic growth is now largely uncontested. One indicator of human capital frequently used for the pre-1900 period is age heaping, which has been increasingly used to measure gender-specific differences. In this note, we find that in some historical samples, married women heap significantly less than unmarried women. This is still true after correcting for possible selection effects. A possible explanation is that a percentage of women adapted their ages to that of their husbands, hence biasing the Whipple index. We find the same effect to a lesser extent for men. Since this bias differs over time and across countries, a consistent comparison of female age heaping should be made by focusing on unmarried women.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)304-313
    Number of pages10
    JournalEconomic History Review
    Volume65
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Keywords

    • Specialized histories (international relations, law)
    • Literary theory, analysis and criticism
    • Culturele activiteiten
    • Overig maatschappelijk onderzoek

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How did women count? A note on gender specific age heaping differences in the 16th-19th century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this