How deep does justice go? Addressing ecological, indigenous, and infrastructural justice through nature-based solutions in New York City

Zbigniew Jakub Grabowski, Katinka Wijsman, Claudia Tomateo, Timon McPhearson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Scholarship on Nature-based Solutions (NbS) primarily focuses on the potential for NbS to deliver multiple benefits to humans and biodiversity from networked natural systems. These approaches, if enacted without sensitivity to local contexts and histories, can deepen long standing injustices resulting from the destruction of complex self-organizing ecological systems, the usurpation of Indigenous governance and knowledge, and the prioritization of technical managerial approaches transforming nature into infrastructure. Here we review, synthesize, and critically reflect on existing scholarship on the rise of NbS in New York City, USA, to inform environmental policy in support of just transformations of complex urban systems. To do so, we examine NbS within the context of the social-ecological-technological system (SETS) of NYC. We organize our review and synthesis around three interrelated concepts of justice: Ecological, Indigenous Environmental, and Infrastructural Justice. Ecological Justice entails addressing the harms, needs, and desired futures of ecological actors while identifying synergies with human focused environmental justice concerns and movements. Indigenous Environmental Justice requires restoring Indigenous systems of governance and knowledge while making space for a diversity of social-ecological practices of marginalized communities. Infrastructural Justice addresses the historical and ongoing injustices perpetuated through mainstream infrastructure policy and design practice – including Environmental Justice concerns – which have increasingly turned towards NbS. Without embedding these principles within emergent NbS focused environmental policy agendas seeking just transformations, they will likely recreate utilitarian, anthropocentric, and colonial modes of managing nature as infrastructure. We conclude with a research-to-action agenda for meeting the interdependent needs of urban ecosystems and humans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-181
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume138
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • Environmental justice
  • Indigenous environmental justice
  • Nature-based solutions
  • New York City
  • Social-ecological-technological systems
  • Urban systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How deep does justice go? Addressing ecological, indigenous, and infrastructural justice through nature-based solutions in New York City'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this