How Conservative Was the Holy Alliance Really? Tsar Alexander’s Offer of Radical Redemption to the Western World

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter argues that tsar Alexander’s Holy Alliance of 1815 was far less conservative and far more revolutionary than it was later understood to be. To make this point, the chapter reconstructs how this “secret plan” came to be understood as “conservative” and how this reading of the Holy Alliance Treaty was influenced by latter-day interpretations and machinations far more than by its concrete substance at the time. Subsequently, the origins and constitutive elements of the plan are delineated in order to demonstrate that it was a revolutionary amalgam of Christian pietism, semi-scientific Enlightenment theories, and a dose of modern, bureaucratic state centralism. Based on new archival evidence, it will transpire how both Prussian security experts and French semi-scientist scholars contributed to the design of the Holy Alliance. The Holy Alliance contained conservative ingredients, but the liberal and provocative elements stood out—these were however suppressed within a few years by political appropriations by other statesmen.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCosmopolitan Conservatisms
    Subtitle of host publicationCountering Revolution in Transnational Networks, Ideas and Movements (c. 1700‒1930)
    EditorsMatthijs Lok, Friedemann Pestel, Juliette Reboul
    Place of PublicationLeiden/Boston
    PublisherBrill
    Chapter11
    Pages241–260
    ISBN (Electronic)978-90-04-44673-1
    ISBN (Print)978-90-04-44523-9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12 May 2021

    Publication series

    NameStudies in the History of Political Thought
    Volume16

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How Conservative Was the Holy Alliance Really? Tsar Alexander’s Offer of Radical Redemption to the Western World'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this