Historical and contemporary conceptions of trauma-related dissociation: A neo-Janetian critique of models of divided personality

A. Moskowitz, O. van der Hart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Both Pierre Janet and the neo-Janetian contemporary theory of structural dissociation of the personality (SDP) view dissociation as inherently pathological – trauma-related dissociation. However, since the late 19th century, other theories have viewed dissociative subsystems of the personality developing after traumatic experiences as continuous with proposed divisions of normal personality. Taking Pierre Janet's hierarchy of degrees of reality as a guide, along with the basic premises of the theory of structural dissociation of the personality, this paper examines this assumption in constructs from the late 19th through 20th centuries, including ego states, self-states, schema modes and complexes. It is concluded that the SDP concept of dissociative parts of the personality is most consistent with the historical and empirical literature, and that dissociation is best thought of as discontinuous with normal personality.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100101
Pages (from-to)1-10
JournalEuropean Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Volume4
Issue number2
Early online date2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2020

Keywords

  • Trauma
  • Dissociation
  • Personality subsystems
  • Pierre
  • Janet
  • Hierarchy of degrees of reality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Historical and contemporary conceptions of trauma-related dissociation: A neo-Janetian critique of models of divided personality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this