Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Hegel e la disputa sugli universali. Universalismo strategico e politiche dell'emanciazione

Translated title of the contribution: Hegel and the Dispute on Universals: Strategic Universalism and the Politics of Emancipation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This essay revisits Hegel’s concept of universality with a focus on its political implications. Drawing on Étienne Balibar, it argues that struggles for the liberation of the masses and minorities, while rooted in specific contexts and therefore particular, can only be articulated sub specie universitatis. Through an analysis of distinct instantiations of the universal within Hegel’s corpus – particularly his critique of abstract universality in the essay on Natural Law and in the Phenomenology of Spirit, and his formulation of concrete universality in the Science of Logic – the essay seeks to identify the configuration of universality most suited to capture the dialectics of a radical politics of emancipation. This is understood as a partisan politics that, while advocating for a particular cause, simultaneously aspires to universality by aiming to transcend its own partiality.
Translated title of the contributionHegel and the Dispute on Universals: Strategic Universalism and the Politics of Emancipation
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)347-369
Number of pages23
JournalVerifiche
Volume53
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2025

Keywords

  • Hegel
  • Concrete Universality
  • Abstract Universality
  • Emancipation
  • Partisanship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hegel and the Dispute on Universals: Strategic Universalism and the Politics of Emancipation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this