Harnessing ecological theory to enhance ecosystem restoration

Brian R. Silliman*, Marc J.S. Hensel, Jean P. Gibert, Pedro Daleo, Carter S. Smith, Daniel J. Wieczynski, Christine Angelini, Avery B. Paxton, Alyssa M. Adler, Y. Stacy Zhang, Andrew H. Altieri, Todd M. Palmer, Holly P. Jones, Rachel K. Gittman, John N. Griffin, Mary I. O'Connor, Johan van de Koppel, John R. Poulsen, Max Rietkerk, Qiang HeMark D. Bertness, Tjisse van der Heide, Stephanie R. Valdez

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Ecosystem restoration can increase the health and resilience of nature and humanity. As a result, the international community is championing habitat restoration as a primary solution to address the dual climate and biodiversity crises. Yet most ecosystem restoration efforts to date have underperformed, failed, or been burdened by high costs that prevent upscaling. To become a primary, scalable conservation strategy, restoration efficiency and success must increase dramatically. Here, we outline how integrating ten foundational ecological theories that have not previously received much attention — from hierarchical facilitation to macroecology — into ecosystem restoration planning and management can markedly enhance restoration success. We propose a simple, systematic approach to determining which theories best align with restoration goals and are most likely to bolster their success. Armed with a century of advances in ecological theory, restoration practitioners will be better positioned to more cost-efficiently and effectively rebuild the world's ecosystems and support the resilience of our natural resources.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)R418-R434
JournalCurrent Biology
Volume34
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 May 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Harnessing ecological theory to enhance ecosystem restoration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this