Abstract
To mitigate methane emission from urban natural gas distribution systems, it is crucial to understand local leak rates and occurrence rates. To explore urban methane emissions in cities outside the U.S., where significant emissions were found previously, mobile measurements were performed in 12 cities across eight countries. The surveyed cities range from medium size, like Groningen, NL, to large size, like Toronto, CA, and London, UK. Furthermore, this survey spanned across European regions from Barcelona, ES, to Bucharest, RO. The joint analysis of all data allows us to focus on general emission behavior for cities with different infrastructure and environmental conditions. We find that all cities have a spectrum of small, medium, and large methane sources in their domain. The emission rates found follow a heavy-tailed distribution, and the top 10% of emitters account for 60-80% of total emissions, which implies that strategic repair planning could help reduce emissions quickly. Furthermore, we compare our findings with inventory estimates for urban natural gas-related methane emissions from this sector in Europe. While cities with larger reported emissions were found to generally also have larger observed emissions, we find clear discrepancies between observation-based and inventory-based emission estimates for our 12 cities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2271-2281 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Environmental Science and Technology |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 6 Feb 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Crown © 2024. Published by American Chemical Society.
Funding
This work was supported by the Climate & Clean Air Coalition (CCAC) Oil and Gas Methane Science Studies (MSS) hosted by the United Nations Environment Programme. Funding was provided by the Environmental Defense Fund, the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative, the European Commission, and CCAC. Additional funding for this research was provided by the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Ontario Research Fund, and the NSERC. The research results presented in this paper have been developed with the use of equipment also financed from the funds of the "Excellence Initiative Research University" program at AGH University of Science and Technology and the H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie project Methane goes Mobile Measurements and Modelling (MEMO2; https://h2020-memo2.eu/), grant number 722479. We would like to thank the UNEP and CCAC reviewer for their thoughtful questions and suggestions that have helped improve this manuscript. We would like to thank Meghan Demeter for managing and supporting the project as well as facilitating expert discussions with Joe von Fischer, Zachery Weller, Stefan Schwietzke, and Daniel Zavala-Araiza, whose support for this CCAC/UNEP project is also greatly appreciated. We would like to thank the three ES & T reviewers for their thoughtful comments and suggestions.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Climate & Clean Air Coalition | |
Daniel Zavala-Araiza | |
Gas Methane Science Studies | |
Oil and Gas Climate Initiative | |
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions | 722479 |
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions | |
Ontario Research Foundation | |
Environmental Defense Fund | |
Maryland Society of Surveyors | |
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada | |
Canada Foundation for Innovation | |
European Commission | |
Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanislawa Staszica |
Keywords
- cities
- greenhouse gas mitigation
- methane
- mobile surveys
- natural gas