Abstract
In western societies, women’s speech tends to be scrutinized/policed more than men’s, with stigmatized features like uptalk, creaky voice, and the discourse marker like associated primarily with women (despite also being used by men). Here, we explored the developmental roots of this phenomenon, asking whether girls’ speech is scrutinized more than that of boys. Caregivers of Canadian English- speaking 3- to 5-year-olds (N = 194) were asked how they would respond to their child making a salient grammatical error. Caregivers of girls were more likely to report using explicit correction strategies compared to caregivers of boys. Caregivers’ reported strategies were unrelated to children’s morphosyntactic knowledge. We discuss our results within the context of sociolinguistic development and the acquisition of gendered language ideologies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Variation in language acquisition |
| Subtitle of host publication | Unity in diversity |
| Editors | Laura Rosseel, Eline Zenner |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Chapter | 7 |
| Pages | 142-153 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 Nov 2025 |
Keywords
- error correction
- developmental sociolinguistics
- language and gender
- language development
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Grammar policing children: Does gender matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver