Abstract
High mountains are climate change hotspots. Quickly rising temperatures trigger vegetation shifts such as upslope migration, possibly threatening mountain biodiversity. At the same time, mountain slopes are becoming increasingly unstable due to degrading permafrost and changing rain and snowfall regimes, which favour slope movements such as rockfall and debris flows. Slope movements can limit plant colonization, while, at the same time, plant colonization can stabilize moving slopes. Thus, we here propose that response of high mountain environments to climate change depends on a ‘biogeomorphic balance’ between slope movement intensity and the trait-dependent ability of mountain plants to survive and stabilize slopes. We envision three possible scenarios of biogeomorphic balance: (1) Intensifying slope movements limit vegetation shifts and thus amplify instability. (2) Shifting ecosystem engineer species reduce slope movement and facilitate shifts for less movement-adapted species. (3) Trees and tall shrubs shifting on stable slopes limit slope instability but decrease biodiversity. Previous geomorphic, ecological and palaeoecological studies support all three scenarios. Given differences in ecologic and geomorphic response rates to climate change, as well as high environmental heterogeneity and elevational gradients in mountain environments, we posit that future biogeomorphic balances will be variable and heterogeneous in time and space. To further unravel future biogeomorphic balances, we propose three new research directions for joint research of mountain geomorphologists and ecologists, using advancing field measurement, remote sensing and modelling techniques. Recognizing high mountains as ‘biogeomorphic ecosystems’ will help to better safeguard mountain infrastructure, lives and livelihoods of millions of people around the world.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 967-985 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Progress in Physical Geography |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 8 Aug 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: J. Eichel acknowledges support for this study from the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) grant VI.Veni.212.125. M. Stoffel and S. Wipf acknowledge the Research Commission of the Swiss National Park (FoK-SNP) for supporting his work on geomorphic process activity and its interaction with trees, and her work on alpine plant community shifts, respectively.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: J. Eichel acknowledges support for this study from the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) grant VI.Veni.212.125. M. Stoffel and S. Wipf acknowledge the Research Commission of the Swiss National Park (FoK-SNP) for supporting his work on geomorphic process activity and its interaction with trees, and her work on alpine plant community shifts, respectively.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Swiss National Park | |
| Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek | VI.Veni.212.125 |
Keywords
- biodiversity
- biogeomorphic ecosystems
- biogeomorphology
- climate change
- High mountains
- natural hazards
- permafrost
- plant traits
- slope movements
- vegetation shifts