Gender, competitiveness, and task difficulty: Evidence from the field

Britta Hoyer, T.M. van Huizen*, L.M. Keijzer, T. Rezaei Khavas, S. Rosenkranz, B. Westbrock

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study examines the gender gap in competitiveness in an educational setting and tests whether this gap depends on the difficulty of the task at hand. For this purpose, we administered a series of experiments during the final exam of a university course. We confronted three cohorts of undergraduate students with a set of bonus questions and the choice between an absolute and a tournament grading scheme for these questions. To test the moderating impact of task difficulty, we (randomly) varied the difficulty of the questions between treatment groups. We find that, on average, women are significantly less likely to select the tournament scheme. However, the results show that the gender gap in tournament entry is sizable when the questions are relatively easy, but much smaller and statistically insignificant when the questions are difficult.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101815
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalLabour Economics
Volume64
Early online date2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020

Keywords

  • Gender gap
  • Competitiveness
  • Task difficulty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender, competitiveness, and task difficulty: Evidence from the field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this