Abstract
Purpose: Eye movements recorded with mobile eye trackers generally have to be mapped to the visual stimulus manually. Manufacturer software usually has sub-optimal user interfaces. Here, we compare our in-house developed open-source alternative to the manufacturer software, called GazeCode. Method: 330 seconds of eye movements were recorded with the Tobii Pro Glasses 2. Eight coders subsequently categorized fixations using both Tobii Pro Lab and GazeCode. Results: Average manual mapping speed was more than two times faster when using GazeCode (0.649 events/s) compared with Tobii Pro Lab (0.292 events/s). Inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s Kappa) was similar and satisfactory; 0.886 for Tobii Pro Lab and 0.871 for GazeCode. Conclusion: GazeCode is a faster alternative to Tobii Pro Lab for mapping eye movements to the visual stimulus. Moreover, it accepts eye-tracking data from manufacturers SMI, Positive Science, Tobii, and Pupil Labs.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings - ETRA 2018 |
Subtitle of host publication | 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications |
Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery |
Volume | Part F137344 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781450357067 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 14 Jun 2018 |
Event | 10th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, ETRA 2018 - Warsaw, Poland Duration: 14 Jun 2018 → 17 Jun 2018 |
Conference
Conference | 10th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, ETRA 2018 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Poland |
City | Warsaw |
Period | 14/06/18 → 17/06/18 |
Keywords
- Eye-tracking events
- Eyemovements
- Manual classification
- Mobile eye-tracking