Future costs of key emerging offshore renewable energy technologies

Srinivasan Santhakumar*, Hans Meerman, André Faaij

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

A detailed understanding of the technological development pathways of energy technologies will reduce the risks of public energy policy and private investment actions. However, such assessments for emerging technologies, critical for achieving global decarbonization targets, face numerous shortcomings. These shortcomings include limited information at an early development stage, uncertainty in design convergence and performance improvements, and the application of aggregated methodologies in projecting their cost developments fails to explain underlying cost drivers and foresee potential radical changes. This study applies an improved methodology leveraging the merits of quantitative and qualitative methods and shows the technological progress expected for the tidal stream, wave technology, and biofuel production from seaweed in a detailed manner. Tidal stream LCOE declines from 264 €/MWh at 0.1 GW to 61 €/MWh at 50 GW cumulative capacity, with CAPEX, capacity factor, and OPEX contributing to 38 %, 33 %, and 16 % of LCOE reductions. Wave technology LCOE declines from 365 €/MWh at 0.1 GW to 54 €/MWh at 50 GW, with CAPEX, capacity factor, and OPEX contributing 28 %, 59 %, and 7 % of LCOE reductions. For grid connection costs, we assessed several integration choices for both technologies and concluded that sharing grid connection capacity among several installations would lower the transmission costs and serve as a policy incentive for the uptake of such emerging technologies. Further, the bioethanol production cost from seaweed declines from 17.1 €/l at 0.1-million l cumulative output to 4.5 €/l at 50 million l, a 73 % cost reduction in 9 doublings of cumulative output. Identifying fermenting organisms capable of converting the heterogenous monomeric sugars in seaweed is a major limiting factor, resulting in a wide variation in bioethanol yields. Lastly, we also summarized the uncertainties involved in the assessment, their causes, and their impacts on results to improve the understanding of potential development pathways of these technologies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number119875
Number of pages18
JournalRenewable Energy
Volume222
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)

Funding

This article is produced as part of a research project named ENergy SYStems in TRAnsition (https://ensystra.eu/, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/765515) . ENSYSTRA received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No: 765515. This publication reflects only the author's views, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

FundersFunder number
Commission
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions765515
Horizon 2020

    Keywords

    • Cost reduction
    • Decarbonization
    • Energy policy
    • LCOE
    • Offshore energy
    • Technological learning

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Future costs of key emerging offshore renewable energy technologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this