Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

From Outlaws to Judges: Armed Groups and The Administration of Justice

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article reviewAcademic

Abstract

René Provost’s latest book, Rebel Courts: The Administration of Justice by Armed Insurgents, collects an impressive amount of practice of organized armed groups concerning the administration of justice in armed conflicts, and offers a detailed analysis of the legal issues surrounding the creation and functioning of insurgent courts. Drawing from field work and adopting a legal pluralistic methodology, Provost offers a comprehensive overview of how the rebel administration of justice functions in practice and of how international law regulates its different aspects, including the legality of rebel courts, due process guarantees, as well as international, transnational, and national recognition of the judicial practices of armed groups. In this review essay, I highlight the importance and novelty of Provost’s approach, exploring the book’s connections with other legal and non-legal literature on armed groups, and contextualize some of Provost’s arguments concerning rebel law and rebel courts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)362-377
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies
Volume13
Issue number2
Early online date22 Aug 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Copyright 2022 by Eleanor Flatt et al.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Armed groups
  • international human rights law
  • international humanitarian law
  • justice
  • legal pluralism
  • rebel courts
  • rebel governance
  • rebel law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From Outlaws to Judges: Armed Groups and The Administration of Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this