Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to show how what I call critical republicanism can be developed by rethinking the neo-republican theory of domination on the basis of a more continental line of republicanism. On the one hand, I argue that with regard to all three of the most important elements of a theory of non-domination, its normative core, the conception of domination, and its institutional implications, Pettit’s neo-republicanism does contain a powerful critical potential, too easily dismissed by some of his critics. On the other hand, I show how this critical potential can be strengthened by reconceptualizing each of the elements of his theory of domination from a perspective inspired by the Kantian line of republican thought and contemporary critical theory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Radical Republicanism |
| Subtitle of host publication | Recovering the Tradition's Popular Heritage |
| Editors | Bruno Leipold, Karma Nabulsi, Stuart White |
| Place of Publication | Oxford |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Chapter | 1 |
| Pages | 23-46 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780198796725 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- Republicanism
- Critical Republicanism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From Neo-Republicanism to Critical Republicanism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver